Yet More Damn Lies and Statistics

Here's the final, all encompassing data set going back to December 2008.  We've played over 230 games and probably closer to 250 or even 300... the early games were only scored by faction, not by player.  They're not included here.  And we'd been playing for some months before I started the blog. 

Player	Summary Percent	Victories	Faction	Total	Percent
Horak	32%	74	Rebels	20	27%
			Hutts	42	57%
			Empire	12	16%
LaBan	39%	89	Rebels	18	20%
			Hutts	57	64%
			Empire	14	16%
Wood	29%	65	Rebels	25	38%
			Hutts	30	46%
			Empire	10	15%
		228		228
Faction		Victories	Player
Rebels	28%	63	Horak	20	32%
			LaBan	18	29%
			Wood	25	40%
Hutts	57%	129	Horak	42	33%
			LaBan	57	44%
			Wood	30	23%
Empire	16%	36	Horak	12	33%
			LaBan	14	39%
			Wood	10	28%
		228		228
Combinations
Rebels	Hutts	Empire	Count	Percent
Horak	Wood	Laban	38	17%
LaBan	Horak	Wood	40	18%
Horak	LaBan	Wood	35	16%
Wood	LaBan	Horak	50	23%
Wood	Horak	Laban	33	15%
LaBan	Wood	Horak	23	11%

With all the attributable data points from the early years included, Horak edges past Wood, but LaBan holds the lead by 15 victories.  

The Empire still sucks compared to the other factions.  And we all play Storm Troopers equally lousy.  Kent is worse as the Hutts but better as the Rebels than either Ric or Karl.  Hmm? 

Interestingly, back in 2008-2009 we frequently played 2, sometimes 3, games in an evening.  I can only imagine that we were all eating at home first and then only having snacks or dessert over here.